You are here because there is no state in which the debtor was domiciled for at least 730 days prior to the anticipated date of filing. Is there any state in which the debtor was domiciled for 180 days immediately preceding the 730-day period or for a longer portion of such 180-day period than in any other state? 11 USC §522(b)(3)(A).

YES, there is such a state.

If there is such a state then choose it in the Exemptions Database by clicking here:

NO, there is no such state.

If there is no such state, debtor must use the federal exemptions in 11 USC § 522(d).

<aside> 📖 There are two separate bases for this conclusion:

</aside>

1. The only way a debtor can be denied use of the federal exemptions is if the applicable state has opted out. 11 USC § 522(b)(2). If there is no applicable state, there can be no opt-out and the debtor, therefore, retains use of the federal exemptions. In re Arispe, 289 B.R. 245 (Bankr.S.D.Fla.2002); In re Goldsmith, 2003 WL 295690 (Bankr.S.D.Fla. 2003).

2. The "savings clause" in 11 USC § 522(b), hanging paragraph, (added by BAPCPA) states: “If the effect of the domiciliary requirement under subparagraph (A) is to render the debtor ineligible for any exemption, the debtor may elect to exempt property that is specified under subsection (d) [the federal exemptions].”

Return to

Return to How to Determine the Applicable State